Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04683
Original file (BC 2013 04683 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04683
		COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to reflect his service in Vietnam and 
England.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His Temporary Duty (TDY) assignments to Vietnam and England were 
never recorded on his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United 
States – Report of Transfer or Discharge.

In support of his requests, the applicant provides copies of his 
DD Form 214, performance reports, flight records, a memorandum 
from a former pilot who attests to his service in Vietnam and 
various other documents related to his requests.

The applicant provides no rationale as to why his failure to 
timely file should be waived in the interest of justice.

His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant’s DD Form 214 for the period 2 March 1963 through 
21 September 1968 reflects 2 months and 23 days of Foreign 
and/or Sea Service.


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial.  A review of the applicant’s 
master personnel records and documentation submitted failed to 
provide any documents that substantiate Foreign Service time in 
Vietnam, or England.  Although, one of his performance reports 
indicates a TDY to Southeast Asia, it does not reflect an exact 
location.  Southeast Asia comprises numerous countries including 
Vietnam, Cambodia, Thailand and Taiwan.  Without specific 
locations identified they are unable to verify his service in 
Vietnam.


The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

He is concerned that the Air Force Office of Primary 
Responsibility (OPR) did not review his initial submission. 
Therefore, he is resubmitting them as proof of his service in 
Vietnam and England.

In further support of his appeal, the applicant resubmits the 
same correspondence submitted with his original application.

His complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit E.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice with 
respect to the applicant’s request to have his DD Form 
214 corrected to reflect he served in Vietnam and England.  The 
evidence provided by the applicant reflects that he served on a 
variety of TDY assignments in Southeast Asia and in England; 
however, actual locations are not recorded on the DD Form 214, 
rather IAW AFI 36-3202, Separation Documents, Foreign Service 
time is reflected on the DD Form 214 in “years, months, days.” 
In view of the above, we find no basis to recommend granting the 
relief sought in this application. 

4.  Notwithstanding the above, sufficient relevant evidence has 
been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or 
injustice warranting partial relief.  We note the OPR recommends 
denial stating the applicant failed to provide any documents 
that substantiate Foreign Service time in Vietnam, or England.  
However, after a thorough review of the evidence presented, we 
believe a reasonable basis exists to conclude the applicant 
served in Vietnam and England.  In this respect, we note that 
his officer effectiveness report dated in July 1968 reflects 
that he was deployed to Mildenhall on rotation and to South East 
Asia.  He also provides a notarized witness statement from a 
retired lieutenant colonel, who states that he was in Vietnam 
with the applicant in April 1968.  In view of the foregoing, we 
find the OERs coupled with the witness statement sufficient to 
grant boots-on-the-ground in Vietnam and England.  Accordingly, 
we recommend his records be corrected to the extent indicated 
below.


THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he had 
boots-on-the-ground in Vietnam and England.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR BC-2013-
04683 in Executive Session on 29 July 2014, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

 , Panel Chair
 , Member
 , Member

All members voted to correct the record as recommended.  The 
following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 14 September 2013, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 13 January 2014.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 31 January 2014.
    Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, undated, w/atchs.

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04686

    Original file (BC 2013 04686.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: His TDY to Southeast Asia was in Vietnam. Therefore, in view of the fact that applicant has provided a copy of travel orders that appear to substantiate the noted three-month deployment to Southeast Asia was in the Republic of Vietnam, we believe corrective action is warranted. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01571

    Original file (BC 2013 01571.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In 1968, he went TDY to Kadena AFB, Japan for six months. While the applicant requests his DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect service in Thailand; in accordance with Department of Defense directives, the DD Form 214 will not be reissued or amended to reflect specific locations served in an AOR. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04655

    Original file (BC 2013 04655.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPAPP states that after a review of his master personnel records and submitteddocumentation, they were unable to find any documentation to substantiate his Foreign Service time was in Vietnam. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Forcerelating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he served “boots­on-the-ground” in the Republic of Vietnam in 1968. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-04655 in Executive...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05757

    Original file (BC 2013 05757.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214, notarized statements from members who attest to his service in Vietnam, photographs and various other documents related to his request. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He requested a copy of his records from St. Louis; however, when he received his records, included were documents from another military member. The DVA accepted the statements from his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03707

    Original file (BC-2012-03707.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to his application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAA recommends denial, indicating that based on the evidence provided, a temporary duty (TDY) assignment to the RVN cannot be confirmed. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02942

    Original file (BC-2012-02942.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02942 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that he received the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) for his service in Vietnam and Thailand. He spent over 20 total months in Thailand, Vietnam, and Okinawa in 1967, 1968, and 1969. The remaining relevant facts...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01314

    Original file (BC 2014 01314.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His AF Form 7, Airman Military Record, be corrected to reflect boots-on-the-ground at Cam Rahn Bay, Republic of Vietnam from 7 May 1969 to 26 October 1969. The amount of Foreign Service time reflected on his DD Form 214 is correct. However, as pointed out in DPAPP’s letter dated 22 May 2014, the amount of Foreign Service time reflected on his DD Form 214 is correct and specific locations are not annotated on the DD Form 214.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01227

    Original file (BC 2014 01227.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    After reviewing his official military record and documentation he provided, DPAPP was able to verify and confirm boots on ground foreign service time in the Republic of Vietnam and Thailand for a total of 127 days between November 1966 and Mar 1968. In addition, the Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC), Directorate of Assignments could only verify the applicant as having served in Vietnam and Thailand for a total of 127 days; therefore, rendering him ineligible for award of the VCM. Upon...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03253

    Original file (BC 2014 03253.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 December 2011, AFPC/DPAPP notified the applicant that after a complete review of his official military records, they were able to verify and confirm “boots on ground” and foreign service time at Ching Chuan Kang Air Base, Taiwan, from 11 August 1967 to 15 September 1968, for one year, one month, and five days. The Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM) is awarded to members who: (1) served for six months in South Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 and 28 March 1973; (2) served...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02674

    Original file (BC-2011-02674.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP cannot verify the applicant was TDY to Vietnam, nor verify that the author of the supporting statement provided with his submission was assigned with him at Clark AFB or in Vietnam. We note the comments of the Air Force...